| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Hamed & Ors v R ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Hamed v R
''Hamed & Ors v. R'' () NZSC 101〔https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/cases/hamed-v-r/ Hamed and others v The Queen () NZSC 101〕 was a decision by the Supreme Court of New Zealand which ruled on the admissibility of video surveillance. The ruling held that evidence collected using criminal trespass on private land to conduct covert surveillance under a warrant is only admissible for serious crimes. The charges involved were related to the 2007 New Zealand anti-terror raids, as a result of the ruling, charges against all but four of the defendants were dropped.
The ruling was initially suppressed from 24 March 2011 to September 2011. Very shortly after the lifting of the suppression, the Video Camera Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Act 2011〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=Video Camera Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Bill )〕 was introduced and passed under urgency.
== References ==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Hamed v R」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|